The Most Wicket Accepting Bowler - Tendulkar
So, which bowler had the most wicket taking charms in a game? It seems a very simple question with a very simple answer. Unbeatable, should you ask me. A bowler must play for over 10 to 15 days a year, almost every single day, to come close to breaking the record of the majority of wicket taking spells in a game. If talk about the present bowling slot of bowlers, just a couple of bowlers who've ever taken 7+ wickets in a game, and that are in the end of their career, have taken over 800 or 900 wickets in total.
Now then, let's discuss another record breaker. Billington's claim to fame was more bowlers than any other bowler in history. His tally of 1347 wicket taking spells was defeated only by Kumar Dhawan and Sunil Grover. But it doesn't matter, Billington is gone, and how good was he?
Now , what about this man? What was his Discover more here album after coming into the bowling department? He bowled about 1000 runs, which can be quite an achievement, though some say that runs don't add up to wins anyway. But he did win the County Championship two, which is quite an accomplishment also.
There are a number of other records for this guy, but I want to keep things simple here. What was this man's most unbeatable cricketing attribute? It appeared to be his ability to bowl will. This means that however many runs were run within an over, he would figure out how to knock the runs which went beyond him, with an unbeaten bowling actions.
Now then, one of the questions I constantly get asked is that. How do somebody happen to be bowling so many runs and be so unbeatable? The answer lies in his ability to control the pace of the game. And I am not speaking about a wildcat bowling action, I mean bowling 100 centuries.
I have already noted that Kumar Dravid was once quoted as stating that Sachin Tendulkar isn't even a match winner. Nonetheless, this isn't entirely true, because Sachin managed to win the match by almost defeating Prince Fielder in a game played at the Caribbean Islands in the West Indies in the year 1986. But, no cricket fans are able to watch the match that took place between these two greats due to the monsoon rains and a flood. In fact, nobody was aware that this type of match was occurring until Tendulkar came out with his bat and ball to get bat in the field after completing his century!
Now let's take a take a look at the way that Kumar has held his conducts. One of his biggest strengths is his economic character of bowling. He doesn't chase down the ball as harshly as other bowlers do, making it more beatable. He retains his wicket taking abilities under control and is not overly competitive on the area, unlike some other batsmen who tend to choose big hits. When he bowls, he does not rely upon his arms to finish the job, but he takes timely wickets with his legs becomes quite beatable. There are instances when he bowls excessively hard, but he makes the mistake of overusing his arms and legs.
Well, if we've known that Tendulkar is no ordinary bowler, then we need to also understand that he is no ordinary batsman either. This Indian all time bowler has taken to Sri Lanka by storm and he has been the talk of the nation. There are a number of different batsmen that have become incredible cricketing stars immediately, but none has been as fast as this young batsman. It was due to his great level of ability, which enabled him to develop into asbeatable as he's been.
It just means that either they have actually been over powered or they have actually bowled severely if a group can not defend 339 runs. India has actually scored in excess of 325 runs in their last 3 outings. Experiencing the tie today, it appears really not practical that in order to win quickly a team batting first should install a minimum of 350 - 360 work on the board. When Zaheer Khan bowled his 2nd spell he bowled precisely and got 3 great batsmen out. So the concern is, why the Indian bowlers did refrain from doing the same thing in their first spell. Why did they hand out numerous runs?. Why did they bowl many balls that were easily putaway by the English Batsmen?
Needing one run to win- however with simply one wicket in hand- India was in the driver's seat. With all the odds versus him, Bravo dismissed the in-form Singh and secured the win for the West Indies by the slimmest of margins (1 run). The West Indies went on to win that series by a 4-1 margin.
The ball that get rid off Younis Khan at Leeds was an outright peach. It ended up of the rough, pitching on middle and leg. Younis stepped forward for a defence however missed it altogether as the ball relied on strike most wicket taking bowler the top of off stump, simply nicking the bail.
India lost their first wicket in kind of Murali Vijay who socred just 7 runs in 14 delievery and vibrant by Darren Sammy. After that Gautam Gambhir who took most wickets in cricket scored 15 runs in 14 balls with 3 fours. Rohit Sharma was the 3rd guy bold by Kieron Pollard scored 5 runs. India lost their 4th wicket in form Suresh Raina, scored 32 runs, with the aid of 4 fours and 1 huge 6, played high in the air and the catch taken by sammy at the fence strong by Chris Gayle.
Knott was renowned for his agility behind the stumps. Despite his average height, he was able to make spectacular catches- even in front of first slip. His glove-work was very reliable and constant cricket bowler with most wickets - as was his batting.
England won the match and The Ashes. Ponting succeeded but it was not enough. Presence of Kevin Pieterson in the dressing room added essence to the minute.
Vishwanath was an average plus player, who verged on achievement. He definitely did India proud with his batting. Maybe his one failure in Pakistan in 1984 versus Imran Khan and co, put paid to his profession. But his fearless handling of speed bowlers will remain an abject lesson to all Indians.